Below is a statement from Democratic strategist Hilary Rosen explaining her decision to cancel her scheduled appearance on Meet the Press this Sunday:
From Hilary Rosen
"I thank David and the folks at MTP for offering me the chance to participate in the Roundtable. It will be an important political discussion, as it always is on Meet the Press. But I have said enough and while I have unfortunately made the Producer’s job tougher today, I don’t have anything more to say. I apologized to Mrs. Romney and work-in-home moms for mistakenly giving the impression that I do not think their work is valuable. Of course it is. I will instead spend the weekend trying to explain to my kids the value of admitting a mistake and moving on."
Earlier, Rosen tweeted:
I deeply apologize again to work-in-home moms, Mrs Romney & the POTUS. Not going on #MTP this weekend. I'm going to be a mom who stays home
— Hilary Rosen (@hilaryr) April 13, 2012










LOVE IT!!! Go Hilary!!!
Hilary should not have apologized. Mitt made the comment on 1/14/12 that all women with children 2 and over should be working. He further stated "WOMEN RAISING KIDS NEED THE DIGNINTY OF WORK" So I guess this does not apply to his wife. What a hypocrit! ! ! If you want to see the comment it is on Youtube!
Hilary may not have worded it correctly but she was telling the truth. That is more than the GOP can say.
Anyone with a rational thought in their head would know that Hillary Rosen was not castigating any Stay at Home Mother, nor was she insulting Ann Romney. The Romney campaign took hold of this to attempt to make "political repairs" regarding their dismal approval of the majority of women. What Ms. Rosen was so accurately pointing out, before the Press on a slaw week blew her remarks completely out of proportion, that Mitt has to go to Ann to find out what the "women" were saying. Mrs. R and any other "stay at home Mom" certainly makes that choice, sometimes forced into that choice because their Husbands wouldn't allow otherwise, sometimes because they can't find jobs that would afford them to pay for childcare...there are a miriad of reasons why Moms work or don't work. Ms. Romney, truth be told, had priviledges that more than 98% of the women, working or not, don't have & that's a house staff and an abundance of funds to operate those households, never having to worry about whether or not little Mitty wouldn't get the best of medical care when sick or a "roudy-caused" injury sent him to the hospital. Let's face facts, Mrs. R and Mr. R really are out of touch with the majority of households. Her illnesses, I'm sure have presented a struggle for her, but there are millions of women who have like illnesses or worse, yet haven't the financial advantages to aid them. This Republican drumbeat, something that that "wacky" Bauchman is so famous, may get them some news time, only because the Press, like David Gregory, keeps up the drumbeat. Take time to really research what Sen. Gillibrand was saying and you will certainly understand this Republican Party is no friend of the Women. There will always be the 29% who wouldn't give the Obamas credit, even if they found the cure for cancer or World Peace. To try to pin the remarks of an intelligent lady, who frankly owes no apology for making a truthful statement...Ann Romney hasn't been in the workforce since she married Mitty...TRUTH. When she and Mitt were on the campaign trail the campaign had to make a big deal that Mitt said that they were having to do their own laundry on the bus...big f'ing deal...which indicated to me they certainly aren't used to doing their own laundry and they found it news worthy. Most would never have found it necessary to even mention it...it was so phoney. I love how MEN have overwhelmingly been chastising Hillary Rosen, had I been her when Wolf Blistset treated her like a "little girl" and made her turn to the camera and opologize, I would have told him put on an athletic supporter before I crushed his family jewels.
I agree with you Fred, I just can't beleave all the media over something Hillary Rosen said about an issue so small. I guess the republicans have to jump on some band wagon. They have yet to send a message of any importance.
Hilary, I'm so sorry this is being blown so out of proportion. I know what you were trying to say, and that you did not disrespect motherhood or stay-at-home moms, but were simply pointing out that the super wealthy don't face the same challenges as moms who must also work to put food on the table. This is the GOP blaming you for their failure to support women, working women, women's health needs, women't day-care needs, women's birth control needs, and the list goes on.....Mitt Romney's policies are the outrage, not you Hilary! God speed!
Blown all out of proportion? Obama, Michelle, Bob Beckel and a host of other Dems commented saying they thought her statement was stupid, but not you?
Dang are you confused!
Here comes the SPIN. Trying to say... Meant to say... mis spoke too, right... Maybe 'Out of Context' will be the next pass Rosen will get.
I'm sorry but I come from a family where my mom had to go back to work. I don't think that Ann Romney has had to work as much as my mom. My wife also went back to work. No way can anyone convince me that a mom who works and takes care of the kids is on equal terms with one who just takes care of the kids. Right now I'm a stay at home dad, not because I want to but because I'm looking for work. I'd love to do this the rest of my life but it's economically not feesable for us. The sacrifices that parents make by going to work, in my opinion, outway those sacrifices made by those that stay home.
amen to that
fissile, You may be right that working moms have more on their plate, but as a teacher I can tell you that the children benefit from mom staying home-in many ways. Remember, it's not all about you.
In response to fissilemissile: First, Rosen's comment was a direct attack, an insult of Ann Romney. The insult itself was based on ignorance. Ann Romney is not a wealthy woman lounging on the couch sucking on bonbons. She raised 5 sons - whew!!! Sure she had staff. However, that means she also had to assume the role of manager, making decisions about hiring, evaluating, and firing if necessary. With 5 homes, she is probably ultimately responsible for smooth operations. As First Lady of MA she surely was swamped with social obligations and still has many social obligations to this day. Ann Romney has a remarkable record on charity work. She has given generously to those in need. She knows the plight of the poor and otherwise disadvantaged. In 1998 she must have experienced enormous stress when diagnosed with MS and breast cancer in 2008. -- In response to Rosen, Ann Romney merely pointed out that 'staying home' raising 5 sons is work and that she made a choice that woman should have. That does not mean that she is unaware that many women do not have a choice.
So someone had a thought and expressed it? This is America. You can only say something I agree with. Oh, wait. I'm a Democrat. OK, say what you want.
Are you friggin KIDDING me?? You must have watched FOX NEWS for HOURS to dig up this schlock!!!
Rosen's comment was NOT a direct attack on Ann Romney, it was a direct attack on Mitt Romney for even suggesting that Ann Romney even has a "clue" about what the women in this country think or feel.
So Ann Romney played the trophy wife??? Exactly WHAT qualifications did THAT give her to understand the issues of women who are NOT trophy wives??
Yes, she has medical issues AND she has the best healthcare available, a quality of healthcare that is NOT available to all women - so what's your point?
AND, in her role as Romney's advisor on women, she has FAILED BADLY. As an example, WHY is it that Romney believes that only RICH MOMs work???? He has said over and over that poor women and women on welfare with children need to get jobs to "learn the dignity of work"! If this is the kind of advice Ann Romney is giving Mitt Romney, he needs to find a better advisor!!!
Fastpitch,, Your comment relating how fissile's giving his experience was unwarranted and egotistical is a typical right wing corporate response. Did you actually hear what Anne Romney response was because if you did and if your honest then you would know that she could never understand how a working class mother has to work and take care of her family. Most working class mothers don't have the choice to stay at home and take care of her family. You need to educate yourself about what real working class mothers have to do so their family can survive.
Amen to that..Anne Romney said she made the "choice" to stay at home... only trouble is... the vast majority of women don't have that choice..and in most cases 'No' other options but to work one, two or even more jobs just to survive. If Anne wanted to be truthful.. she should have said she "..at least had the option to stay at home to raise her kids. An option (her) husband would like to savagely curtail for the vast majority of women in America so that they can learn what dignity is." That is the Romney Model for America. You know I have no problem with a person doing well and making a good, even great living and becoming rich... However, I do have a problem with HOW they make their fortune... The Romneys made their riches literally on the skeletal remains of the lives and businesses with which they came into contact with. If Romney gets into that office, you can bet anything that he will treat America with the same savagery he used when he worked for Bain Capital... He'll sell off pieces of America to make himself and his friends a hefty profit, and let the rest go bankrupt.
I agree 100% with Susan. Anyone with a working brain understood the point Hilary was making.
The DNC hates stay at home Mom`s. We all heard it loud and clear.
not true-- what planet do u liv on
Scott, I guess you didn't hear what Mitt stated in January of this year relating to mothers who are on welfare. If you actually listened to Mitt you would know that he stated that those mothers should be forced to go to work and have someone else look after their kids.
Please stay away from apple pie! I like apple pie.
This may be one of the most stupid "news" moments thus far in this campaign. And that's saying a lot considering all of the other stupid non-news items that have dominated this stupid campaign. Mothers work hard. Fathers work hard. Now, I wish the Congress would stop the constant campaigning and actually do some work itself. That would be the best lessen learned here.
To me this is just one more example of how the Republicans have no plan on how to make themselves believable on real issues, so they jump on something like this to distract the voters. They are so transparent and sad.
I didn't realize Barack Obama represented the Republican Party (we better let them know asap!) since he publicly has "jumped"on this in order to "distract" voters.
I think what is "transparent" and "sad", is that you are spurting out opinions and commentary without really knowing that of which you speak of. Try turning on the news (maybe even watch MTP) ,break open a newspaper, or hell, even go to a news based website and take a minute to bring yourself up to speed with the world's event's of the day. That may, and I caution, may, prevent further open mouth and insert foot moments for you.
No one put a gun (couldn't have been Zimmerman) to Hilary's head to say such babble, she has to own up to it (looks like she is) and press on. Sometimes people just say stupid things.
Hilary: I'm sorry you felt you had to apologize for speaking up on this issue. There was nothing to apologize for. Unless you felt a need to apologize for wording your comment in a way that allowed the Culture Vultures to snap it up, manipulate it, assign it a new (and clearly unintended) meaning and attempt turn it into a faux rallying cry for the opposition who will look for any red meat of nuance to be cynically horrified over.
Most intelligent women - many of whom are mothers of every ilk - knew EXACTLY what you were saying. And those of us who aren't under the sway of the GOP, agreed with you.
But certainly, apologize for giving them the red meat. Damn our humanness that allows us to speak candidly and maybe use a phrase that wasn't quite on the money!!!
But you've learned, Hilary; you'll be much more careful in how you word your opinions in the future. Because that's what matters most in today's culture: whether or not we use or don't use certain buzz words and phrases...NOT whether we're saying anything of merit or importance.
If you knew EXACTLY was Rosen was saying, you would have noted that she came from a place of ignorance.
HIlary, you were right. The Romneys own 6 homes, had 5 maids in 2010, they have no idea what struggle to keep a roof over your head, or feed a child is. Maybe Ann Romney has struggled with her health, but I'll guarantee she never had to worry about how her health care would be paid for. The Romneys are clueless.
this was just another case of the rw trying to twist what someone on the left says and turn it into a big issue. the gist of it is that ann romney has never had a job whereby she had to leave the kids home to help the family meet it's monetary obligations. ann, as is true with most rich people, probably had a nanny that did a lot of the housework for her in addition to helping her with the kids. 97% of the women in this country don't have that luxury, and paying for babysitting service is a chunk out of their income. to ann romney, it is chump change.
I agree with you totally, Susan. I think, altogether, what Hillary Rosen said was the sentiment of the irritation that most women and working mothers feel when someone like Mrs. Romney tries to convince us that she knows what it's like. She doesn't and she never will. Hillary Rosen does not need to explain herself to anyone, nor does she need to apologize for anything. What she said was from a real place, because that's what it is, a real issue.
Wow! It seems a lot of lesbians think the same as Hilary. Proof is in the comments on this board. Now, I guess I will inherit the rage from them. Just more proof of their agenda.
You represent your namesake quite well. Is there anything else hateful and moronic you'd like to say? Or are women the focus of your spew today?
What a ridiculous statement, it says a lot more about you ,than the people posting here!
Heavens, Adolph, most of the postings are by mothers. You had a mother, didn't you? Shame on you.
This issue is being blown so far out of proportion it's ridiculous. My daughter and I were both stay at home mothers for a time. Our experiences bear NO resemblence to the experience of Ann Romney. Did we have nannies, cooks, gardeners, housekeepers, private schools and summer camp for the kids, plus personal assistants who paid bills, ran errands, chauffered the kids, etc.? NO! Further, when I returned to work it got even tougher... sick children with decisions to be made about whether I could "afford" to stay home because we needed the money, school obligations, grocery shopping, bill paying, laundry, child care, etc. etc. added onto all of the other issues. Come on- Ann Romney may have produced 5 sons, but she in no way as one born, raised, and married into wealth able to understand on any level what it's like to be either a working, or stay at home, mom in the real world.
Bingo, Valmezzo!
You are making a TON of assumptions that have no basis in fact. Ann Romney was/is very hands-on, and did NOT employ nannies or personal assistants to help raise the kids. Have you checked out how Mitt and Ann lived while in college, when they first started their family? Humble beginnings. Both Ann's and Mitt's parents ended up wealthy, but didn't start out that way and they taught their kids to be self-sufficient. Mitt and Ann lived very frugally, and got by without help from parents. It wasn't until Mitt was out of school before he started to earn big money, and by then the family was well underway. But even if they never did have to struggle financially, the very idea that just because someone is wealthy that they automatically can't understand how other people can struggle and suffer is ludicrous. How many rich liberal politicians are there that you have no problem believing understand the plight of the less fortunate? Why would you just automatically believe that Ann Romney has no idea? Do you have any idea the kind of volunteer work she's been involved in over the years, both within her church and otherwise? In LDS congregations, there is no difference between rich and poor. All are alike, and all pitch in and help with various jobs. One of Ann's responsibilities for a time was as president of the Relief Society in her congregation. That organization is charged with caring for the needy, and it's a big responsibility. No pay, no publicity, and a lot of hard work. That experience alone would have opened Ann's eyes to all kinds of difficulties people face, financially and otherwise. Educate yourself, and then you'll see why Rosen's comments were so out of line. It was a personal attack against a good person who, in fact, does care about others and has proven it throughout the years by her actions, and it backfired completely.
well said Cal
I think this woman has been beaten up enough for her remark....she has apologized over and over. Funny, no one is asking Allen West for an apology on his comments about communism in the democratic party. What she meant was that Ann Romney cannot relate to women who have to scrounge through their purses to pay sometimes at the grocery store or HAVE to work not want to work and still be there for their families. Ann Romney is a wonderful Mom and Hilary never intended to demean her but what she is asking is for Mitt Romney to come out and say what his feeling are not pass them through his wife. He has not and he has already said he will kill Planned Parenthood and Roe v. Wade. We women want to hear from him...is this his plan and he cannot put off his plans until after election like he wants. We women want to know now. The rep. party has blown this totally out of proportion...Hilary never meant to disrespect women who stay home and they know it.....they think they will get the women's vote by doing this....think againl
Pat. We already know what she mean't by what she SAID. And she was WRONG and now so are you! LOL!
There's an enormous difference between "I'm sorry for what I said" and "I'm sorry you were offended by what I said."
The first acknowledges responsibility for a mistake. The second blames the listener.
Like most political personalities - Ms. Rosen chose the second option. I don't believe she is a bit sorry for what she said. But she's VERY sorry we were stupid enough to be offended.
On a positive note, Michelle Obama's reaction was immediate and firm, and placed responsibility squarely on Ms. Rosen's shoulders, where it belongs.
She was Wrong. She took a cheap shot. She said she aimed the rifle at the Husband, but decided to aim the gun at the wife like the White House told her to do. It is no different trying to call you a bad mother by calling your daughter a slut.
Those on the left are always making excuses for saying something they shouldn't. Maybe they should start doing what their mother told them when they were a child. If you don't have anything nice to say about a person. keep your mouth shut. Maybe she should show her children what it is like to eat a bar of soap.
You are so ridiculous, I am sure the White House told her to do this, so they could come out and apologize for her. That was the mistake here, no one should have apologized, because she said nothing wrong about Ann or stay at home moms. I sure hope you aren't a mom and feed your children this total crap you are spewing. Have you even heard the whole context of the connversation. If so, all you got out of it, is Obama told her to do it? Explains a lot.
Unlike several others on this site, I will make my point without insulting others. I have been a stay at home mom and a working mom. Neither is easy work, but when my husband was in danger of losing his job, I had to return to work to ensure we had healthcare for our family. I had no choice, which is what makes me different from Ann Romney. You will find that $250 million dollars gives one lots of options. I am also guessing that she had domestic help as well. It is obvious to me that Hillary was making the point that Ann Romney had a choice, which many mothers like myself never had. Let's focus on which candidate will provide more assistance to mothers of all kind. That's the point.
And that point is what needs to be focused on. She's one person; there are millions of other stay-at-home and working mothers that she will never be able to relate to. Has Ann Romney ever held a job outside of her family? Did she ever have the 5 children she has now before her marriage? Has she ever had to decide between food or electricity or even a place to live? Has anything ever happened to Mitt that she had to take over the household finances for any given period of time? No, because they probably also have personal accountants and lawyers for all of that. The Democrats who have scolded her for her remarks should apologize to Rosen for leaving her out in the cold when she was merely expressing the sentiment of the majority of Democratic constituents.
Mormon women have a group called Relief Society where all women- rich to poor- get together to learn and discuss issues that effect home, family, church, and community. They discuss how each woman can help the sick, the crippled, the poor, the elderly, and etc. They work at canneries (where they can food that is given to those struggling to buy food), deliver food to the home-bounds and etc. They are encourage to serve the needy, the church, schools, community, and so forth. If she's truly an active member, she would be expected to attend and participate. She may not have struggled personally, but being in such a group can give her insight to the struggles and sacrifices the poor in her ward and stake have to make to survive. I'm not saying she does, individuals in every religion are involved with others on different levels.. just that the opportunity is there for her to connect to those that are poorer.
As far as Hilary and any other political commentator- if they think they are knowledgeable enough to make a statement on TV/ Radio- they need to pick their words carefully- Democrats would be all over a Republican if they made that statement. If you don't have thick skin... stay off TV/ Radio... the extremes of both parties can be brutal when the other slip-ups.
And I wonder if she has met with other LDS women who are less fortunate. Her husband's policies would not indicate that she has. I lived in Salt Lake for 7 years and I do know how very much LDS women are expected to contribute to their communities. Many do work and have 5-7 children and attend church functions 3-4 times a week. Some suffer this superwoman image and end up taking Prozac and some even have committed suicide under these kinds of pressure. So, I understand how much they do. They are often strong and nurturing. But I don't think the LDS church much understands their pressures. As for Mrs. Romney, she clearly would have help with her duties. It is one thing for a well-to-do woman to have the choice to stay at home; it's another for a poor woman who must work. In fact, the poorer women are, the more we expect them to work. We don't give the poor the choice to nurture their children at home. So, there are disparities and a kind of double standard. Just as income gaps widen, so do these disparities widen.
From what I've read about her... her family didn't inherit a fortune but worked for it. Ann's father was a self-made business man from Wales. She gained her undergraduate degree at Harvard by attending night courses since she was raising a family.
But we women can be quite catty and insecure/ snobbish when it comes to those women that are different than us... based on skin color (white/ black/ Asian/ Hispanics (and other diversity we can think of) are never understood by other women), not rich enough, not poor enough, not the same political party, raised in the wrong area of the country (Yankee vs Southern), religion. Sometimes we are the ones that put the distance between us... never giving the other a chance to get to know us- never wanting to get to know the other person. If she wants to be a part of us she needs to give up and turn her back on that which we disagree with, are envious of, or intolerant of.
No, No, Noooo -- Rosen said Ann Romney "never worked a day in her life" - I can only describe that as insulting, demeaning --
Women are part of every social class, obviously. Rosen was buying into a stereotype that somehow rich women don't work, don't have to lift a finger - and this probably true of some rich women. But, in Ann Romney's case this stereotype does not apply, it is blatantly wrong and misplaced. Ann Romney has worked more, contributed more to helping those in need, had more responsibilities and heartaches than most of us will ever experience. Her life has not been a series of good times.
An interesting point. And if I may be so bold as to add to it:
Wasn't Ann Romney the First Lady of the great state of Massachusetts? While it's an unpaid position, it's certainly a job - with responsibilities that far exceed the reach and scope of the average housewife. To suggest that this position was not work is to suggest, by extension, that Michelle Obama's current position doesn't require work, either. And we all know that's ridiculous.
Class act Hillary! Everything blown out of proportion....look forward to hearing you down the road.
why did she feel the need to bash Ann in the first place? seems very childish to me.
Note to Adolf...which ones are the lesbians? I just see women who care making comments here. Funny you don't....what is your last name Adolf?
I support Hilary in her right to free speech. If Hilary had inserted the words "worked outside the home" then everything would have been politically correct. We all know that being a parent is hard work. I have been a stay at home mom, a single parent working mom, and a underemployed mom. Mrs. Romney has not had the experiences I've had and I have not had the experiences she's had. Who cares? She is not running for president.
i don't see the big deal. just because Ann Romney has never had to struggle doesn't mean she can't understand or comprehend how difficult it may be for others.
I know ditch digging is hard, I don't need to "experience it" to know the obvious.
She was not bashing Ann, she was making a point about Mitt, if you had cared to listen to the whole conversation, but much more to complain about if you take it out of context. I am sorry she felt the need to apologize and while I love our President and First Lady, they are dead wrong on this one.Of course we all work raising our families, she was talking about working outside the home, and the trials and tribulations that can bring to a family. Ann has no idea what that is like, she has never had to worry about feeding her children, if she can afford medical care for them, or if she can pay the rent. With all the ridiculous things Repulicans are trying to do to women, it affects their pocketbooks, their war on women is just that, and she has no comprehension of what that is like, so why is he taking advice from her. She involved herself in this campaign so they are both fair game. Hilary said nothing about her that was not true.
"Out of Context"... The great Liberal PASS... We all heard Hilary Rosen bashing stay at home mom`s... Next you can tell us what she "meant" to say or that maybe she "mis-spoke..." God knows we`ve heard that one a thousand times.
Considering how many times Romney stated "he didn't understand the question" or "was taken out of contest", I think we can forgive this minor "faux pas" by Hilary. However, considering the clubbing the repubs are taking in the polls w/women its no wonder they are beating their chest in righteous indignation over this minor mis-spoke......LOL.
Message to David: Invite Hilary back soon. Her voice deserves to be heard.
Linderella,
Yeah, good idea. I would love to see "Meet The Left" dance around this one, if I could stand to watch it, anymore. Since Tim Russett died, it has become a Far Left breeding ground.
"Mom`s drive the Economy." Mitt Romney. "Stay at home Mom`s need not apply." Democratic National Committee member and CNN stategist, Hilary Rosen.
Don`t be a 'Hilary Rosen' - a DNC Strategist... That`s right up there with getting a Lewinski...
Hardly. If you've bothered to read any of the other comments, you'd know that women experience different "choices" at different economic levels. Many, many, many poorer women simply do not have the choice she has, nor the assistance, nor the health care, etc., etc. The issue is about ALL women, not what one woman with super-privileges does or does not do. How we treat all women and all children in this country shows what our true priorities are. In the end, the country itself will suffer for not having paid attention to the need for more choices. In fact, it already is. Companies complain there are not enough trained, skilled workers. That's because we don't invest in workers or women or children. We dis-invest, unlike other active and successful economies. In the end, it's truly our loss.
In my opinion the point here is being missed... She said something without thinking and it offended people, she apologized. And that should be enough. But the argument isn't about who is working, it is about people feeling respected. Isn't being pro women about being PRO WOMEN and not PRO - political agenda? Until women start respecting other women for, or in spite of, their opinion, How can we expect everyone else to?
UnityJane said it well, who cares what experiences Ann Romney has had vs our own. Everyone has problems and issues at every economic level. I can assure you that my life has not had many parallels with our current FLOTUS, but it doesn't make her experiences (or mine) less valid. Until women start respecting women we won't see 'women's issues' treated with the seriousness they deserve.
You Far Left doorknobs always want it both ways. It was okay to call Palin a slut, but not Obama's contraceptive Plant. It was okay to criticize Mrs. Romney, Palin and Bachman for their core beliefs, regarding work and family, but it's not okay to go after Michelle Obama. Trying to understand what the Far Left truly believes in is like trying to pick up a turd on the clean end.
I think u misunderstood what 'Hilary Rosen' was saying--- Romney's wife has no clue what hard work is.. shea been rich all her life--
There's always one. A commentor who uses "ad hominen" attacks--name-calling, in a word. Just be aware this is the lowest form of rhetoric and rhetoricians actually consider it's use to be equivalent to a logical fallacy. You can make your point without ugly name-calling.
telling a stay at home mother she has never worked a day in her life is ugly
No Bobby, I fully understood what Rosen was saying and trying to convey to her listener's. What she did convey and what everyone heard, is her pathetic, inane, sophmoric attempt to convince listener's that Republican's are bad and don't vote for them. She assumed that the Far Left doonknobs would back her up. What she didn't understand was,they are cowardly..... and they won't. When something can come back and bite them, the Far Left can run faster than a speeding bullet.
Jill, Most people are so sick of the vicious attacks and hypocrisy that the Far Left displays, 24 hours a day, sometimes name calling is the only way to vent. Forgive me for acting like a childish Far Left doorknob.